<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: is it truth that yahoo server runs on freeBSD ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freebsd.info-blogs.info/is-it-truth-that-yahoo-server-runs-on-freebsd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freebsd.info-blogs.info/is-it-truth-that-yahoo-server-runs-on-freebsd/</link>
	<description>Not just another blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:57:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: redhatsam</title>
		<link>http://freebsd.info-blogs.info/is-it-truth-that-yahoo-server-runs-on-freebsd/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>redhatsam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 20:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freebsd.info-blogs.info/is-it-truth-that-yahoo-server-runs-on-freebsd/#comment-135</guid>
		<description>MY vote is for 
* Windows XP for Desktop OS
* Linux for Server
* Mac OS for Multimedia
* Solaris for Large organisation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MY vote is for<br />
* Windows XP for Desktop OS<br />
* Linux for Server<br />
* Mac OS for Multimedia<br />
* Solaris for Large organisation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brentc</title>
		<link>http://freebsd.info-blogs.info/is-it-truth-that-yahoo-server-runs-on-freebsd/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>brentc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freebsd.info-blogs.info/is-it-truth-that-yahoo-server-runs-on-freebsd/#comment-134</guid>
		<description>As far as cost goes I would choose linux. I think both are on par as far as stability goes. I have a web/ftp/ssh server that is running Windows 2003 Server and it has never crashed. But it is expensive. It all depends on what you want to use it for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as cost goes I would choose linux. I think both are on par as far as stability goes. I have a web/ftp/ssh server that is running Windows 2003 Server and it has never crashed. But it is expensive. It all depends on what you want to use it for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erkzh</title>
		<link>http://freebsd.info-blogs.info/is-it-truth-that-yahoo-server-runs-on-freebsd/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>erkzh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 01:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freebsd.info-blogs.info/is-it-truth-that-yahoo-server-runs-on-freebsd/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Voor de webserver? Linux is het beste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voor de webserver? Linux is het beste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
